Legal Opinion

Roemler v. Dice

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1912No. 7,496PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Charles O. Roemler, as receiver of the Veedersburg Clay Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.

This action was brought by Seth M. Rich-creek, as receiver for the Veedersburg Clay Company, against appellee, to recover the sum of $2,000, alleged to be an unpaid subscription on twenty shares of the capital stock of said corporation, for which appellee had subscribed when the company was organized. Appellant Roemler succeeded Richcreek as receiver while the suit was pending before the lower court.

The complaint was in one paragraph, to which appellee filed a general denial and three paragraphs of affirmative answers. Appellant’s separate demurrer to the Second, third and fourth paragraphs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cambridge Lodge, No. 9, Knights of Pythias v. RouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Stoy v. BledsoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Hibberd v. TraskIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Keys v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kern v. SaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quail v. BantaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Weil v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Millner v. Gary Paper Mills, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API