Legal Opinion

Berettoni v. Sargentini

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1926No. Docket No. 5527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

Action for deceit. Judgment for plaintiff as prayed and from that judgment the defendants have appealed, bringing up a bill of exceptions. In their brief the appellants present several points, among others are the points that the plaintiff’s complaint did not state a cause of action because no damages were alleged nor the amount of the damages, and, second, that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because there was no evidence that the plaintiff was damaged, or, if he was damaged, the extent or amount of his damage. In view of the conclusion which we have reached we do not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. George Cople Co. v. HindesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. De Vall v. PerrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Stouffer v. EymannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swasey v. De L'EtancheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API