Legal Opinion

Stouffer v. Eymann

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1919No. Civ. No. 2028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from, a judgment of the Superior Court of • Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial.- Fred H. Taft, Judge. Appeal from order dismissed; judgment affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial..'The complaint stated in the ordinary form causes of action upon two promissory notes admitted to have been executed by .the defendants and made in favor of the plaintiff. The notes were given as the result of an agreement made between plaintiff and defendants, the. amount represented thereby being for commissions to be paid to the plaintiff by defendants in consideration of services rendered. Plaintiff was a real estate broker and was instrumental in effecting an exchange…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holton v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hirsch v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance Co. v. LiebesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Baker v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berettoni v. SargentiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API