Legal Opinion

George Cople Co. v. Hindes

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1917No. Civ. No. 2135PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George E. Crothers, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against the plaintiff after an order sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint, the plaintiff having declined to further amend its pleading.

The action is one for the recovery of damages for the alleged fraud and deceit of the defendant occurring in the course of an exchange of real properties between the parties to the action. The property which the plaintiff received in such exchange consisted of a piece of real estate in the city of San Francisco upon which a building had been erected prior to said exchange. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Cross v. BouckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Divani v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Clar v. Board of Trade of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Wood v. NiemeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McClory v. DodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API