Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brennan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 20, 1982PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

In these two companion cases we are asked to determine the applicability of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and art. 12 of the Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of the Commonwealth, in circumstances involving the performance of breathalyzer and field sobriety tests administered for the purpose of determining whether a driver of a motor vehicle is under the influence of intoxicating liquors. We conclude that neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor art. 12 is violated by the administration of these tests.

The facts of these cases may be briefly stated.…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. PaszkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. NadwornyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API