MacY v. Blatchford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant Douglas Blatchford, M.D., 1 appeals from an order and an amended order setting aside a judgment for defendant and granting plaintiffs Danita and Lawrence Macy a new trial in a medical malpractice action. Plaintiffs 2 conditionally cross-appeal from the original judgment, asserting that, in the event we set aside the new trial order as procedurally defective, that judgment must, nevertheless, be reversed because of errors at trial. Plaintiffs contend, particularly, that the trial court erred in barring them from pleading and proving an alleged sexual relationship between defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Carter v. MoberlyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Maulding v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- MacY v. BlatchfordOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BranstetterOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BranstetterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- In re the Marriage of HaimovitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.