Legal Opinion

State v. Branstetter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2001No. CC CR97-0077; CA A100029; SC S47567PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Defendant seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, his appeal from a trial court order that forfeited certain animals that he owned to an animal care agency. Although the trial court’s forfeiture order was issued during, and had the same case number as, defendant’s prosecution on charges of first-degree animal neglect, ORS 167.330, the forfeiture order was based on a different statute, ORS 167.347. That statute provides for forfeiture of animals that have been impounded pending final disposition of a criminal animal-neglect charge, and does not make…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ThreetOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. K. P.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Gattman v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Garganese v. Oregon Department of JusticeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. MacY v. BlatchfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. McCall v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. FentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. McKinney v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API