Legal Opinion

Smith v. Putter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 2003PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1096KLEIN, J.

¶ 1 Plaintiff Gerald Kevin Smith was involved in an automobile accident case where defendant Carole M. Putter conceded her negligence. The jury found that Defendant’s negligence was not a substantial factor in causing Plaintiff Gerald Kevin Smith’s injuries, and Plaintiffs appealed.

¶2 While the defense medical experts disputed the claimed injuries to Smith’s wrist and shoulder, these doctors agreed that the accident aggravated a prior hip condition and necessitated two hip surgeries. Therefore, the verdict finding that the accident was not a substantial factor in causing injuries to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Andrews v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kraner v. KranerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Botkin v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Elliott v. IontaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Pentarek v. ChristySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Mietelski v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API