Mietelski v. Banks
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Appellees in an action for personal injury resulting from an automobile accident. Appellant raises three issues for our consideration: whether the trial court erred in excluding from the jury videotape surveillance evidence of Appel-lee, Ireneusz “Eric” Mietelski, due to unfair surprise and prejudice caused by late production of the tape; whether the court erred in failing to charge the jury that it had to consider whether Appellant’s negligence was a substantial factor in producing Eric Mietelski’s injuries; and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Andrews v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Trude v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Bindschusz v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Philadelphia Contributionship Insurance v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Starr v. VenezianoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Ferrara, B. v. Russella, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Sturgis v. Thompson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013
- Weeks, M. v. G&E Real Estate Management ServicesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017