Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thomson v. Giessel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1953PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

Ch. 434, Laws of 1953, provides as follows:

“Section 1. 20.26 of the statutes is created to read:
“20.26 State superintendent; emergency substitute teachers. There is appropriated from the general fund to the state superintendent a sum sufficient for the biennium 1953-1955 for the administration of his functions under sec. 39.35 and for making the payments provided for therein.
*560“Section 2. 39.35 of the statutes is created to read:
“39.35 Emergency substitute teachers; compensation. (1) The legislature hereby finds and declares: The difficulty of obtaining qualified persons to substitute during…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dudgeon v. LevitanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State ex rel. Klefisch v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Loomis v. CallahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Piper v. EkernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Buse v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API