Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Thomson v. Giessel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1952PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Sec. 26, art. IV of the Wisconsin constitution states:
“Extra compensation; salary change. Section 26. The legislature shall never grant any extra compensation to any public officer, agent, servant, or contractor, after the services *55shall have been rendered or the contract entered into; nor shall the compensation of any public officer be increased or diminished during his term of office.”
Sec. 42.535, Stats., provides that every qualified retired teacher “shall be paid an additional $1 per month for each year of teaching experience” and it designates such payments as an “additional benefit” and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Raines v. Board of Trustees Pen. FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. Dudgeon v. LevitanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- State ex rel. Atwood v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Krebs v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Columbia County v. Board of Trustees of Wisconsin Retirement FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Harvey v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Fulton Foundation v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- State ex rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Wisconsin Professional Police Ass'n v. LightbournWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.