Buse v. Smith
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
We have fully considered the briefs, oral arguments and extensive appendix submitted by the respective parties, and the briefs of the several amicus curiae. It is our conclusion that the negative-aid provisions of school district financing, as mandated by secs. 121.07 and 121.08, Stats., are violative of the rule of uniform taxation set forth in art. VIII, sec. 1, of the Wisconsin Constitution.
As pertinent to this action, sections 121.07 and 121.08, Stats., provide:
“121.07 General provisions; state aid computation. In this subchapter: it
“'(¿/shared COST, (a) ‘Shared cost’ is the cost of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Sonneborn v. SylvesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Fair School Finance Council of Oklahoma, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Jackson v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.