Isaacs v. Frank Meline Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
The action which gives rise to this appeal is one wherein plaintiff sought a judgment against defendant for damages alleged to have been suffered by her as a result of losses she sustained in an exchange of properties, which exchange she asserts she was induced to make through the fraud and deceit of defendant’s employees and agents. The complaint sets forth with considerable detail the acts and representations which are alleged to have constituted the fraud and deceit charged. The trial court found that all of the allegations of the complaint were true. Inasmuch as we have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Swinnerton v. Argonaut Land & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Quinn v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Eddy v. American Amusement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- McNulty v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Conger v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Tackett v. CroonquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.