Legal Opinion

Mech v. Pullman-Standard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 10, 1984No. 82-1612PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This action arises from the dismissal of a third party complaint filed by Pullman Standard (Pullman) against Steel Builders, Inc. (Steel Builders), for implied indemnity and contribution. Originally, Dennis Mech, an Indiana resident, filed a one-count complaint alleging negligence against Pullman, William J. Van Dyck Contractors and Builders, Inc., Industrial Commercial Engineers, Inc., and Wheelabrator-Frye, Inc., for injuries he sustained on August 26, 1979, at a construction site at the Pullman plant in Hammond, Indiana. Van Dyck, the general contractor, had engaged Steel Builders to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McClish v. Niagara MacHine & Tool WorksDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1967
  3. Velle Transcendental Research Ass'n v. Esquire, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Badorski v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Irene Morris, Individually and as Mother and Best Friend of Tina Morris v. Linda J. Jenkins, Yurcell Turan and Team MacHine Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Newell Co. v. PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Allied Corporation and General Electric Railcar Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Vickrey v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Toomer v. United Resin Adhesives, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API