Legal Opinion

McClish v. Niagara MacHine & Tool Works

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 29, 1967No. IP 65-C-540PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DILLIN, Judge.

This cause comes before the court for ruling on the motion of one of the third party defendants, Harper J Ransburg Company, Inc. (“Ransburg”) for summary judgment dismissing the third party complaint of Niagara Machine and Tool Works (“Niagara”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted as to it.

The amended complaint states a claim for personal injuries against Niagara and Allen-Bradley Co. (“Allen”), based upon the alleged breach of implied warranties that a press and foot switch were free from defects and not unreasonably dangerous to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Slinkard v. Babb, WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Bessler v. LaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Travis v. Rochester Bridge Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Indianapolis Power & Light Co. v. Brad Snodgrass, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lewis v. Stran Steel Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Mullen v. CogdellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API