Legal Opinion

Balaam v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14187PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Plaintiff and defendant each own a serial bond issued under and by virtue of the Street Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730), both bonds being liens upon the same lot, or piece of real property. The bond owned by the plaintiff was issued on the third day of October, 1925. The bond owned by the defendant was issued on the twenty-ninth day of October, 1926. The point in issue is whether the priority of the lien under which each of the parties hereto claim is fixed by the provisions of section 23 of the Improvement Act of 1911, or by section 66 of said act. As originally enacted,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. German Savings & Loan Society v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Woodill & Hulse Electric Co. v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Chase v. City Treasurer of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Monheit v. CignaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Conley v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Thibodo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Cullinan v. GreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Thompson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API