Carter v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
PROHIBITION to the Superior Court of Sonoma County. S. K. Dougherty, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Emmet Seawell, J. R. Leppo, and W. F. Cowan, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Prohibition. The petition alleges that plaintiff was duly elected city treasurer of the city of Santa Rosa at the election held on April 2, 1902, in said city, at which election C. M. Bumbaugh was a candidate for the same office; that a certificate of election was issued to plaintiff by the city council after having duly canvassed the returns of said election, and he duly qualified, and thereupon became, and ever since has been, the duly elected and qualified city treasurer for the term of two years from and after April 9, 1902. It further appears that Bumbaugh, on April 7, 1902,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Linegar v. RittenhouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- People Ex Rel. Lawlor v. WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Selleck v. Common Council of South NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- People ex rel. Swift v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by31 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Toncray v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Sisson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Wilcox v. EngebretsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.