Legal Opinion

Russell & Gallagher v. Yesler Estate, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1916No. 12897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered December 14, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action to recover a balance due upon a building contract, including compensation for extra work and material. The case was tried before the court without a jury, resulting in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, from which the defendant has appealed.

In April, 1913, respondents, Russell & Gallagher, entered into a contract with appellant, Yesler Estate, Incorporated, *261agreeing to construct a certain portion of a building about to be constructed upon one of its lots in Seattle. The provisions of the contract, so far as here necessary to notice them, are as follows:

“That…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Elgin v. JoslynIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. County of Cook v. HarmsIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Boyce v. CupperOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Fay v. MuhlkerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wager v. OddenWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API