Legal Opinion

Wager v. Odden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1928No. 21197. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

The plaintiff in this action filed an amended complaint alleging that, in 1919, as the owner of a contract with the Federal government for the removal of timber on the Port Madison Indian Reservation, he entered into a contract with one Jacob Shold and the defendant Peter Odden for the logging thereof. The contract was also signed by Wager’s partner, (x. E. Tilton, with whom he was associated under the name of the Suquamish Logging Company. Early in 1920, Shold’s interest in, and liability under, the contract was taken over by the defendant Emil Myreboe. In the latter part of 1920, because of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. WatrousWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Purcell Safe Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sweatt v. BonneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Russell & Gallagher v. Yesler Estate, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Black v. Philip Miller Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API