Legal Opinion

City of Elgin v. Joslyn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1891PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. Isaac Gr. Wilson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by appellee against appellant in the Circuit Court of Kane County to recover for work and material furnished by appellee in the construction of the Elgin Water Works. The declaration contains the common counts only. There was a written contract between the parties, but the claim as made is for extras, and extra work and material, alleged to have been done and furnished on account of changes required to be made by the City. The verdict was for $2400.92, but plaintiff below remitted $400.92, and judgment was finally entered for $2000.00.

The first error…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County of Cook v. HarmsIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Sexton v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Weintz v. HafnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. VosburghIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. ChewIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Watson Lumber Co. v. GuennewigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Donovan v. PurtellIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. City of Chicago v. McKechneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API