McIntosh v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.
Rodney P. Mcintosh (hereinafter, “Mov-ant”) appeals from the motion court’s overruling of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant failed to demonstrate that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness, to object to the prosecutor’s voir dire questions, and to offer evidence regarding the victim’s prior sexual abuse allegation. Movant’s claim of prose-cutorial misconduct for comments made during closing argument is not cognizable pursuant to Rule 29.15, and therefore, is unreviewable. The motion court’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Brian J. Dorsey v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- John Childers v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- In the Interest of D.C.M., a Minor v. Pemiscot County Juvenile OfficeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- Roberts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.