Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 26, 2013No. SC 93118PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.

Rodney P. Mcintosh (hereinafter, “Mov-ant”) appeals from the motion court’s overruling of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant failed to demonstrate that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a witness, to object to the prosecutor’s voir dire questions, and to offer evidence regarding the victim’s prior sexual abuse allegation. Movant’s claim of prose-cutorial misconduct for comments made during closing argument is not cognizable pursuant to Rule 29.15, and therefore, is unreviewable. The motion court’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Brian J. Dorsey v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. John Childers v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  4. In the Interest of D.C.M., a Minor v. Pemiscot County Juvenile OfficeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  5. Roberts v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API