Legal Opinion

City of Stoughton v. Thomasson Lumber Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 2003No. 02-2192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

¶ 1. The City of Stoughton filed this action for breach of implied warranty against Thomasson Lumber Company, claiming that 225 telephone poles the City purchased from the company were not merchantable at the time of delivery. After a trial to the court, the court entered judgment against Thomas-son Lumber, and Thomasson Lumber appeals. We conclude: (1) the trial court did not erroneously decide that an implied warranty could contain a warranty on future performance of the poles, but rather properly considered the generally expected service life of like poles in determining whether these…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Northridge Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Family Mutual Insurance v. GolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cannon Technologies, Inc. v. Sensus Metering Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  3. Morrison v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance v. GolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Ammerman v. HAUDENCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API