Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Rankin

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 26, 2007No. 2006AP980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

¶ 1. Dr. Thomas Rankin, the Medical Protective Company ("Medical Protective"), and the Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund ("the Fund") appeal from an order directing a verdict against Rankin on the issue of informed consent in a medical malpractice action. The directed verdict was a sanction imposed by the court for spoliation of evidence. They argue that the sanction of a directed verdict against Rankin was an erroneous exercise of discretion by the circuit court. Medical Protective and the Fund also appeal an order requiring both parties to provide insurance coverage to Rankin. They argue…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. Cease Electric Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson v. Evan Hall Sugar Co-Op., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Fremont Casualty Insurance v. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Biskupic v. CiceroCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  2. Morrison v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Barron Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. S.R.T. (In re Termination Parental Rights to A.A.T.)Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  4. Rao v. WMA Securities, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rao v. WMA Securities, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API