Legal Opinion
Ammerman v. HAUDEN
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 29, 2004No. 03-2249Published
1Opinion of the Court
John R. Ammerman, Robert L. Klein and Brian G. Sumption, Plaintiffs,
Roi Investments, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Paddy A. Hauden and Susan A. Scholl, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 03-2249.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Opinion Filed: July 29, 2004.
Before Deininger, P.J., Dykman and Vergeront, JJ.
¶1 VERGERONT, J.
ROI Investments appeals the circuit court's judgment of $303,523.15 on counterclaims related to a failed real estate transaction. ROI contends: the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in entering a default judgment against it; a counterclaim for civil conspiracy was neither…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Teff v. Unity Health Plans Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Henry v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Rumage v. GullbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.