People ex rel. Howland v. Dreher
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to abate a nuisance, alleged to have been committed by defendant by obstructing the south half of a public street for a distance of six hundred and sixty feet, which street is situate in the city of Pomona, county of Los Angeles, California.
The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, written findings filed and judgment rendered thereon in favor of defendant, from which judgment and from an order refusing a new trial plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.
The court upon the issues made by the pleadings as to whether the street in question had been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- City of San Francisco v. CalderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- The City of Oswego v. . the Oswego Canal CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- People v. Rio Nido Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Morse v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.