Legal Opinion

Morse v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1954No. Civ. 8404PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment decreeing that certain real property owned by defendants and appellants has been dedicated to public use for beach and athletic field purposes, and is also subject to easements for similar use in favor of plaintiff and respondent and other property owners on whose behalf he sued. Said judgment also perpetually enjoined defendants from interfering with either the public or private use of the property. 1

The real property here involved now consists of three parcels, two of them forming what is known as the “beach,” and the third comprising the “athletic field.”…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. County of Los Angeles v. BerkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McKinney v. RudermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Morse v. E. A. Robey & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Richmond Ramblers Motorcycle Club v. Western Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API