Legal Opinion
People v. Rio Nido Co., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1938No. Civ. 5851PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This is an action brought in the name of the People of the State of California against eighty-six defendants, claiming the ownership of certain lots in a subdivision upon the Russian River in Sonoma County, known as Rio Nido, formerly Eaglenest.
Plaintiff contends the lands involved were dedicated as a public park in 1906, and that such dedication was judicially determined by a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County in 1912. In reply the defendants contend that no such dedication ever occurred and that the judgment of 1912 was not determinative of the issues here presented, and is not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Venice v. Short Line Beach Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- City of Manhattan Beach v. CortelyouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- County of Inyo v. GivenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kosanke v. KoppIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Pleasant Valley Canal Co. v. BorrorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Santa Clara v. IvancovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- M. B. Zaninovich, Inc. v. Teamster Farmworker Local Union 946California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Morse v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.