Legal Opinion

Cintes v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 28, 1931No. 3312Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise, described in the entry as pictures, and claimed in the protest to be original paintings and free of duty under paragraph 1704 of the Tariff Act of 1922, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of San Juan, P. R., at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1449 of that act.

Par. 1449. Works of art, including paintings in oil or water colors, pastels, pen and ink drawings, and copies, replicas, or reproductions of any of the same; statuary, sculptures, or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. United States v. ScanlanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API