Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joseph Poli Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 23, 1956No. 60189; protest 153001-K (Pittsburgh)Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Johnson, Judge:

In this case, the principal claim is that certain imported articles, such as altar parts, a pulpit, statues, stations of the cross, and a communion rail and steps, are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1774 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as articles imported for presentation (without charge) to, and for the use of, corporations organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes. One item is claimed to be entitled to free entry under paragraph 1807 as an original sculpture. The decision of my colleagues overrules the claims as to most of the articles…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Hammerstein v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Westfeldt Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API