Legal Opinion

Atlanta University v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 19, 1957No. C. D. 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

An imported Westminster striking mechanism with gear and four hammers which comprises the subject merchandise *259was classified by the collector of customs as “Clock Pakts, Sub Assemblies” within the purview of paragraph 368 (c) (3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 368 (c) (3)), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 62739, supplemented by Presidential notification, 86 Treas. Dec. 337, T. D. 52820, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 1}£ cents for each part or piece, plus 32}(¡ per…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eidlitz & Son Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hermle Black Forest Clocks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API