Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1903No. S.F. No. 3504PublishedCited by 6 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of Sau Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment in the superior court, which was entered in July, 1902. The defendant in due time gave notice of its intention to move for a new trial upon a statement of the case to he thereafter prepared, and upon the ground, among others, of errors occurring at the trial. This notice was followed in due time by a proposed statement of the ease to which the plaintiff proposed amendments which were not accepted, and proper steps were thereupon taken to procure a settlement of the statement by the court. By various orders of the superior court, the settlement of the statement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Somers v. SomersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Neale v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Vinson v. Los Angeles Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Steve v. Bonners Ferry Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API