Legal Opinion

Somers v. Somers

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1890No. 13636PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from the judgment in the action above entitled, upon the ground that no transcript has been filed here, notwithstanding more than forty days have elapsed since the appeal was perfected. But it will be seen by reference to rule 2 of this court that the time within which a transcript must be filed does not in all cases commence to run from the date of perfecting the appeal. If there be a bill of exceptions or statement which may be used in support of the appeal, the forty days allowed by the rule for filing the transcript does not commence to run until such…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wall v. MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Steve v. Bonners Ferry Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Kelly v. Ning Yung Benevolent Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API