Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Reinhold

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 7, 1984No. 8228SC1353PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

In the construction of their new dwelling house the defendants Reinhold partially erected the house on the adjoining, unimproved, lot of the plaintiffs, the Bishops. In this action for trespass the Bishops sue for removal of the building. The jury by its verdict found that the defendants had committed a wrongful trespass, that the deed from the Reinholds to the Bishops did not contain a mutual mistake of the parties or a mistake or inadvertence of the draftsman as to the description of the lot, and did award the Bishops $3,250 in damages. The judgment decreed that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Johnson v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Smith v. VonCannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Singleton v. Haywood Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Woodring v. SwieterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Williams v. South & South Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API