Legal Opinion

In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation Fee Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 6, 2011No. Case ML 09-2093 AG (ANx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER, GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO COMPEL, DENYING REQUEST FOR MORE DISCOVERY, AND ORDERING FURTHER BRIEFING

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011) changes the arbitration landscape and thus alters the course of this case. This Court previously granted in part and denied in part a motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant DirecTV (“Defendant”) in an order dated September 7, 2010 (“September 2010 Order”). After Concepcion appeared on the horizon, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Van Ness Townhouses, Edward A. Shay Ai O. Shay, Plaintiffs v. Mar Industries Corp. Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. KeyBank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Meyer v. T-Mobile USA Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  3. Imburgia v. DIRECTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Adams v. AT & T MOBILITY, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
  5. Ferguson v. CORINTHIAN COLLEGESDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API