Ferguson v. CORINTHIAN COLLEGES
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL INDIVIDUAL ARBITRATIONS
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Compel Individual Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration, in the consolidated cases Kevin Ferguson, et al. v. Corinthian Colleges, et al. (Doe. No. 38) and Sandra L. Muniz, et al. v. Corinthian Colleges, et al. (Doc. No. 21). 1 The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. After considering the moving,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kilgore v. KeyBank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012