Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. A. S.-M.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 6, 2015No. J060700; Petition Number M3J060700, D4J060700; J060701; Petition Number M3J060701, D4J060700; J060702; Petition Number M3J060702, D4J060700; J060703; Petition Number M3J060703, D4J060700; J060704; Petition Number M3J060704, D4J060700; J060705; Petition Number M3J060705, D4J060700; A155378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, P. J.

In this consolidated appeal, mother and father appeal judgments terminating their parental rights to their six children. As to father, we affirm the juvenile court’s determination that father is unfit and that termination of his parental rights is in the best interests of the children. As to mother, however, we conclude that she was deprived of a fundamentally fair termination proceeding, in violation of her rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because the juvenile court appointed a guardian ad litem (GAL) for mother without sufficient legal basis. We,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State Ex Rel. State Office for Services to Children & Families v. StillmanOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. SumpterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. M. U. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Department of Human Services v. Z. E. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. C. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. C. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API