Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. K. M. J.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 22, 2015No. 2261JU, 2262U; Petition Numbers 13226104JU, 13226204JU; A158098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE MUNIZ, S. J.

Mother’s parental rights were terminated after she failed to appear at her termination hearing. Following the hearing, mother moved to set aside the termination judgment due to excusable neglect. The juvenile court denied mother’s motion, and she appeals. We affirm.

We review the denial of mother’s motion for an abuse of discretion. See Dept. of Human Services v. A. D. G., 260 Or App 525, 534, 317 P3d 950 (2014). That standard is considered highly deferential, because the “trial court has some discretion to deny a motion to set aside even if the movant establishes ‘excusable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Department of Human Services v. A. D. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Department of Human Services v. K. M. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Department of Human Services v. T. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. A. L. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. J. J. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Dep't of Human Servs. v. K. D. S. (In re C. D. S.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Department of Human Services v. K. M. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. L. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API