Legal Opinion

Citizens Saving & Loan Co. v. Warren

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating the case: The correctness of the ruling, from which defendant appeals, depends on whether the present proceeding is a new action or a continuation of the old one; for, if it be the same suit, the condition upon which the verdict was set aside at the May Term, 1931, still binds; otherwise not.

In those cases where the plaintiff seeks to use the original action to repel the bar of the statute, expressions may be found tending to support the theory of a guasi-continuous action. Anonymous, 3 N. C., 63. “In legal contemplation both make but one” — Ruffin, J., in Morrison…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Grimes v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Wiley Electric, Inc. v. BrantleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Nowell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Ingle v. . CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API