Legal Opinion

Ingle v. . Cassady

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per CueiaM.

This is the “same candle blown out in the original action,” Ingle v. Cassady, 208 N. C., 497, 181 S. E., 562, “and lighted again in the present action.” C. S., 415; Loan Co. v. Warren, 204 N. C., 50, 167 S. E., 494; Motsinger v. Hauser, 195 N. C., 483, 142 S. E., 589.

As the facts found by the trial court are supported by the record, Batson v. Laundry Co., 209 N. C., 223, 183 S. E., 413, the judgment will be affirmed on authority of Hampton v. Spinning Co., 198 N. C., 235, 151 S. E., 266, where it was said tbat “if upon the trial of the new action, upon its merits, ... it appears to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Batson v. City Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Batson v. . Laundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Citizens Saving & Loan Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Charles S. Hunt v. Howard H. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Cleve v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Briley v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Smith v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API