Pouncil v. Branch Law Firm
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAVID J. WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendants to Fully Comply with Second Set of Interrogatories and Second Requests for Production (ECF No. 74). Plaintiff requests an order under Fed. R.Civ.P. 37(a) compelling Defendants to provide full and complete responses to her Second Set of Interrogatory Nos. 26-32 and Second Request for Production Nos. 2-4 and 7. The motion is granted.
I. Background Facts
Plaintiff Altina Pouncil, Administrator of the Estate of Willie Sue Clay (“Estate”), filed suit against Defendants Turner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. DabneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Surgery Center at 900 North Michigan Avenue, LLC v. American Physicians Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
- Allen v. Mill-Tel, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Alabi v. RollinsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
- Bindner v. TraubDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.