Legal Opinion

Allen v. Mill-Tel, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 18, 2012No. 11-1143-EFMPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

K. GARY SEBELIUS, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and, in the Alternative, for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories (ECF No. 45). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Procedural Conference Requirement

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this district’s local rules require a moving party to confer with opposing counsel about the discovery dispute at issue before filing a motion to compel.1 Defendant contends plaintiffs did not confer…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shook v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Pulsecard, Inc. v. Discover Card Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Lear Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  5. Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Erfindergemeinschaft UroPep GbR v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016
  2. Buster v. Board of County Commissioners for Lincoln CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
  3. Clark v. Hyatt Hotels CorporationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  4. Deakin v. Magellan Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
  5. Florece v. Jose Pepper's Restaurants, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API