Kuhn v. Stansfield
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Howard County.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
In August, 1863, Michael J. Kuhn, advanced to his daughter, Mary A. Somerville, by way of settlement, the sum of eight hundred dollars, as appears by the' following receipt, signed by herself and husband:
“ Ellicott’s Mills, Aug., ’63.
“We hereby acknowledge that We have received of M. J. Kuhn, eight hundred dollars ($800) as an advancement, with a view to a portion or settlement of his daughter, the undersigned Mary.
“ Mary A. Somerville,
“ J. H. Somerville.”
*215In March, 1866, Somerville being largely indebted, executed the bill of sale set forth in the proceedings, and a few days afterwards, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edelen v. EdelenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Wickes v. ClarkeNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Worthington v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
- Stocket v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- Gover v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
3Cited by19 opinions
- Matthews v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Bennett v. BennettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bast v. BastMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Grover & Baker Sewing Machine Co. v. RadcliffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.