Legal Opinion

Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 23, 2015No. Consol. 10-00371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Musgrave, Senior Judge:

The defendant’s International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) has submitted its third Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Redetermi nation.” or. “RR3”) on the antidumping duty investigation into Certain Coated Paper from the PRC. 1 Familiarity with the case 2 is presumed. To summarize, the investigation was remanded for (1) further insight into the use of market economy purchase (“MÉP”) prices for certain inputs procured from the Kingdom of Thailand by or for the plaintiffs (herein “APP-China”), and (2)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United States, and Goss Graphics Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Gold East Paper (Jiangsu) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  5. CS Wind Vietnam Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Itochu Bldg. Prods. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  3. Shenzhen Xinboda Industrial Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API