Klages v. Cohen
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for an order, purportedly under Rule 12(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, “and other pertinent rules and decisions”, striking from the answer of defendants, except Nalven, the pleaded defenses of the statutes of limitation.
Under Rule 12(b), the inclusion in the answer of a defense that the Statute of Limitations bars the action is proper. Upon motion under Rule 12(f), “the court may order any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter stricken from any pleading”. It is apparent that plaintiff does…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burke v. Mesta Mach. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Sinaiko Bros. Coal & Oil Co. v. Ethyl Gasoline Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Randolph Laboratories, Inc. v. Specialties Development Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1943
- O'Reilly v. Curtis Pub. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Tartak v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Lopez v. Resort Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Denenberg v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Tartak v. District Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953