Legal Opinion
Denenberg v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 22, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 32442Published
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to strike as insufficient the second, third and fourth defenses raised by defendant’s Answer (Document 6).
The facts are these: Plaintiff is a citizen of New Jersey. On or about February 15, 1955, she was a civilian employee of the United States Naval Exchange in London, England, and she fell and sustained certain injuries in the Navy Exchange Building, allegedly in the course of her employment. At the time, the Exchange had an employer’s liability policy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Annunzio Somma v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Harry Berkowitz, Guardian of the Estate of Wilson Kinch, a Minor, and Wilson Kinch v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Milkman v. Ætna Life Ins.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Naomi Glushakow Denenberg v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Klages v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947