Legal Opinion
Sinaiko Bros. Coal & Oil Co. v. Ethyl Gasoline Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 1942PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
Defendants move under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 *306U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order striking certain paragraphs from the complaint on the grounds that they are evidentiary, argumentative, irrelevant, impertinent, constitute legal conclusions, and are prejudicial.
The suit is for treble damages under the provisions of the Clayton Act, Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 15. A decree was entered against the defendants in favor of the United States for violation of the antitrust laws of the United States, which was affirmed by the United States…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Railroad Commission v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
- Westmoreland Asbestos Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Citrin v. Greater New York Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Alden-Rochelle, Inc. v. American Society of Composers, Authors & PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.