Anderson v. Laws
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Action by Carl O. Anderson against Roy D. Laws and Clarence A. Wicks for deceit. The defendant Laws moved for judgment on the pleadings and, from the judgment granting the motion, plaintiff appeals.
AFFIRMED. This was an action for deceit against Roy D. Laws and Clarence A. Wicks. The defendant Laws moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
The complaint sets forth a cause of action based on fraudulent representations inducing the purchase by the plaintiff on March 28, 1944, for $8,000.00, of an interest in a business conducted by the…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Weiss and Hamilton v. GumbertOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.