Legal Opinion

Kikuchi v. Ritchie

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1913No. 2,165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Error is assigned to the order of the court overruling the demurrer, and to the instructions of the court to the jury whereby they were told that the contract contemplated that the defendant in error, if the case went to the Circuit Court of Appeals, should represent the plaintiff in error in that court.

The first clause of the agreement, whereby the defendant in error was retained as proctor and attorney “in all matters arising out of the alleged law violation,” evidently refers only to the various services that were to be rendered in the District Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wardell v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kersey v. GartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. Berthold v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  4. Myers v. CrockettTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Moyer v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Mutter v. BurgessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API