Legal Opinion

Scott v. Wall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 21, 1989No. 22403-4-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWinsor, J.

Glenn and Gloria Wall (Wall) appeal an order granting partial summary judgment to Lewis and Janet Scott (Scott) in an action to enforce a promissory note. We reverse.

On May 31, 1986, Wall entered into a contract with Scott to purchase and operate Wall's restaurant. Paragraph 10 of the purchase agreement provided:

This offer is subject to and contingent upon the ability of the purchaser to negotiate an acceptable lease for not less than 3 years ... for the existing location of the restaurant. If such a lease cannot be obtained, this agreement shall be null and void and not binding on purchasers.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Emrich v. ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Vogt v. HovanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mortgage Buyers of America v. Wolfman, No. 519778 (Jan. 28, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API