Legal Opinion

Emrich v. Connell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1986No. 52070-4PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Petitioners—the general partners, C. Richard Connell and George E. Toles, and various limited partners of Issaquah Farms Unlimited — are owners and lessors of real property situated in Issaquah, Washington. The lessees, respondents Linn and Marian Emrich, operate a recreational airport on this property. They brought an action seeking to prevent petitioners from exercising a right of termination expressly provided for in the written lease, claiming that petitioners had orally agreed not to terminate the lease until the property was "ready to be developed." The trial court admitted evidence of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Black v. Evergreen Land Developers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Wilson v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. MA Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API